Sons of Cain Illustrations

SONS OF CAIN BOOK ILLUSTRATIONS
[Warning:  Graphic Images that some may find disturbing.]

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE


SERIAL KILLERS BEFORE JACK THE RIPPER - PART 3
THE BRITISH
Slouching Toward Whitechapel: Sex Crimes in Britain Before Jack the Ripper

As amazing as it seems, there appear to be no recorded cases of pathological lust sexual serial killers in Britain before the appearance of the Whitechapel "Jack the Ripper" serial killer in 1888.  That does not mean there weren't any; only that no account on the historical record survived if there were. (And surely there were.) The legendary Sweeney Todd, the “Demon Barber of Fleet Street” in London who cut his customers’ throats with a razor and tipped their bodies out of their chair down a chute into the basement of the barbershop, is just that: a legend. The case of the Sawney Bean cannibal clan that supposedly killed hundreds of victims in Scotland, salting some of the corpses for winter feeding, is apparently as much a myth as Sweeney Todd. The Sawney Bean tale is an artifact of a sixteenth-​century The Hills Have Eyes/The Texas Chainsaw Massacre brand of war propaganda disseminated during England’s conquest of the northlands.  As in frontier United States, there were outlaw serial killer bandits in Britain and there were female serial poisoners in the Victorian age, and there were the serial killer partners William Burke and William Hare in Edinburgh, Scotland, who perpetrated at least sixteen murders in 1828, but that was strictly business: they were selling corpses for profit to medical schools.  There were, however, two notorious cases widely reported of psychopathological sex crimes that shocked Britain and would set the stage for the appearance of Jack the Ripper.

The “London Monster”—1790.
 
(Below) From 1788 to 1790, an incipient serial “werewolf” was stalking London’s well-​dressed women. He would approach them as they fumbled with their keys at their front doors, or he would suddenly rush up on them from behind on the street, and drawing his head close to their ear and shoulder, he would mutter obscenities and viciously slash and stab them in the buttocks through their silken dresses. More than fifty women reported being assaulted by the perpetrator. Some were hit across the back of the head by his fist; others he abused only verbally; some of those he slashed escaped injury due to the fashion of the day, consisting of multiple thick petticoats, stays and bloomer-​type underwear.  But not all escaped unharmed.

Two sisters returning from a royal birthday ball were at the front door of their London town house when the Monster ran up on them and, pinning one between the door and front railing, mumbled obscenities and then drove a knife through her evening dress. The physician who treated her testified that the gash from her lower back to buttocks was nine inches in length and ran as deep as four inches at one point; it would have penetrated into her abdomen had her stays not deflected it. It took effort for the offender to drive the edged weapon home, and in some of the cases he was reported to have dropped to one knee to force the blade deeper. These were raging, angry attacks, and potentially lethal.  London was as shocked and alarmed by these extraordinary and inexplicable attacks as they would be by Jack the Ripper a hundred years later.  Today a series of assaults like these would be recognized as warning signs of a serial predator likely to continue escalating the violence and lethality of his attacks.

London Monster 1790 

London Monster 1790 


(Below) In June 1790, one of the victims and her companions thought they recognized their assailant, and he was pursued, brought to them, identified and arrested. He turned out to be a thirty-​five-​year-​old Welshman named Renwick (Rhynwick) Williams. Unlike the brutal, ugly monster everyone expected, Renwick was a handsome gentleman who was popular with women, just like Ted Bundy would be in his day.

The press and noisy crowds outside the jail were calling for the Monster to be hanged, but due to the peculiarities of the criminal code at that time, assault, even with intent to murder, was a mere misdemeanor. Having been panicked for two years, however, the public was demanding stiff punishment for the Monster. The prosecution was hard-​pressed to find an appropriate felony with which to charge Renwick Williams. He was eventually charged with three counts of the misdemeanor assault, carrying a penalty of two years for each conviction. Although no knife had ever been found in his possession, and Renwick had never been seen with one and had no record of attacks against women, he was convicted and sentenced to six years while proclaiming his innocence all the while. After his release, Williams married, fathered a child and then vanished from history.

Historians debate the question of his guilt or innocence, but the attacks spawned a number of copycat 'monsters' in France and Germany. In Paris in 1819, women on the street were attacked and cut about the thighs and buttocks by piqueurs (from the French for “to prick”). The term “piquerism” is still used today in forensic psychopathology to describe paraphilic stabbing or slashing committed as a substitute for sex.  The attacks are most often focused on the breasts, buttocks, genitals or torso of a victim with the offender relishing the penetration, and the sight and smell of blood and abdominal viscera expelled through the wounds. 

London Monster 1790 

London Monster 1790 


Frederick Baker—Alton, Britain, 1867.
 
(Below) The first seriously twisted, lycanthropic, sadistically pathological sexual-​lust murder on the record in modern Britain occurred in 1867 in Alton, Hampshire, a pastoral little paradise of an English market town, about fifty miles southwest of London’s ugly, teeming slums. Although it was not a serial killing per se, this brutal single murder set the tone for things to come.  On August 24, 1867, eight-​year-​old Fanny Adams was out playing in a park with her seven-​year-​old sister, Lizzie, and a friend, eight-​year-​old Minnie Warner, when they were approached by twenty-nine-year-old Frederick Baker, a lawyer's clerk on his lunch break, a respectable gentleman, well-​known in the town.   Baker lured Adams into the bushes and mutilated and eviscerated her, scattering her body parts in the field and mounting her severed head on a fence pole.

Afterwards Baker returned to his office to complete his work day. The other two girls and witnesses who saw him in the vicinity of the murder scene quickly identified Baker as a suspect and he was arrested later that evening while having a beer after work in a pub with his office colleagues. A knife was found in his possession.   When police searched his desk at work they found a journal in which he made the following entry for that day: “Killed a young girl. It was fine and hot.” At trial Baker's lawyer argued that he intended to write, “Killed, a young girl. [Today] it was fine and hot.” Frederick Baker was convicted of murder and hanged December 24, 1867.   Britain was now ready for the coming of Jack the Ripper.

Fanny Adams Murder 

Fanny Adams Grave 




PURCHASE BOOK HERE




SONS OF CAIN
A History of Serial Killers From the Stone Age to the Present

PETER VRONSKY